Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bob Zuckerberg's avatar

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Robert Zuckerberg <zuckie15@aol.com>

Date: July 15, 2025 at 8:37:29 AM EDT

To: zuckie15@aol.com

Subject: Critics say Zohran Mamdani is antisemitic. He says he’s holding Israel accountable. - POLITICO

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/22/critics-say-zohran-mamdani-is-antisemitic-he-says-hes-simply-holding-israel-accountable-00416388

Expand full comment
Bob Zuckerberg's avatar

As an active retired UFT member I believe our 2000 Delegates have spoken with their 63 % endorsement vote for Mamdani. With that vote, the Union is now saddled with his endorsement, much to the chagrin and consternation of many of our activists and loyal Union members.

I believe the Op Ed I submitted (below)but not published will explain why many of us will not vote for him (despite our Union’s endorsement) and may not vote at all considering the choices we are facing in the upcoming mayoral election.

We Know Antisemitism When We See It — So Why Are We Being Told Zohran Mamdani Is a Friend?

By Bob Zuckerberg

In the months since October 7, American Jews have been told to “stay calm,” “understand the context,” and even “check our privilege” as antisemitic rhetoric floods our streets and institutions. But it’s one thing to endure this from anonymous trolls or distant ideologues — and another when it comes from an elected official in New York City, home to the largest Jewish population outside Israel.

Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani presents himself as a principled progressive. But over time, he has made it unmistakably clear that his politics depend on erasing or minimizing Jewish trauma — and excusing or outright praising those who incite or commit violence against Jews.

Let’s put aside euphemisms. In 2017, Mamdani released a rap track praising the “Holy Land Five,” a group convicted in U.S. courts of funneling $12 million to Hamas, a U.S.-designated terrorist organization. “My love to the Holy Land Five,” he rapped. That wasn’t subtle. That was a political message.

Since becoming a public figure, Mamdani has doubled down. He has refused to condemn the phrase “globalize the intifada” — a slogan regularly chanted at New York protests, where it now serves as a thinly veiled call for violence against Jews globally. The First and Second Intifadas killed over 1,000 Israeli civilians, including children and Holocaust survivors, in bombings, shootings, and stabbings. This is not ancient history — these are traumas that define our living memory.

Worse still, Mamdani compared “globalize the intifada” to the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising — a grotesque equivalency that drew public rebuke from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. They rightly called the comparison “offensive” and “outrageous.”

He didn’t apologize. He didn’t even reconsider.

After the horrors of October 7, Mamdani issued a public statement that failed to name Hamas once. Instead, he criticized Israel’s government. There were no words for the babies burned alive, the families executed, the women raped and paraded. No empathy for a nation reeling from the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.

He later refused to support resolutions affirming Israel’s right to exist or condemning the Holocaust. His office claimed he doesn’t typically sign such resolutions — but this is about something deeper than legislative habits. This is about values.

Mamdani’s legislative priorities are similarly telling. He is a co-sponsor of the “Not On Our Dime Act,” which would empower the state to investigate and potentially penalize Jewish nonprofit organizations in New York for supporting Israeli institutions — even hospitals, youth programs, or universities. It singles out Jewish communal support structures for scrutiny unlike anything else in state law. There is no equivalent targeting of nonprofits that support Chinese, Iranian, Turkish, or Palestinian causes abroad.

This is a familiar feeling for many of us. Jewish history teaches us that antisemitism rarely appears first in the form of violence. It starts with dehumanization. With isolation. With double standards and insinuations that Jews are uniquely dangerous or disloyal. Then, often with a self-righteous smile, it becomes law.

And yet Mamdani is still defended as a “friend” of the Jewish community. His allies insist he is merely “anti-Zionist,” as if that somehow separates him from the centuries-old patterns of antisemitic suspicion and hatred. He recently appeared on the show of influencer Hasan Piker — a man who has called Jews “bloodthirsty pig dogs” and Orthodox Jews “inbred.” Mamdani offered no pushback. He engaged warmly.

At what point are we allowed to say: Enough?

This is not about “criticism of Israel.” Israeli democracy includes fierce internal criticism. Israeli streets are filled with anti-government protests. Israeli courts and journalists hold leaders accountable in ways most democracies can only dream of.

This is about a refusal to see Jewish people as a people — as a nation, with our own history, memory, and sovereignty. It is about the erasure of Jewish identity and Jewish grief under the guise of social justice.

Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks once warned that antisemitism mutates. It doesn’t always look like the past. Today, it wears new clothes — the language of activism, anti-imperialism, and intersectionality. But its essence is the same: the view that Jewish life and legitimacy is uniquely problematic, and must be dismantled.

We are not overreacting. We are not confused. We know exactly what this is.

And if this is what “allyship” looks like in 2025 — refusing to name Hamas, praising terror fundraisers, chanting for global intifada — then Jewish New Yorkers are fully within our rights to say: We don’t need friends like this.

Sources:

Politico: Mamdani defends “Globalize the Intifada”

NY Post: Holocaust Museum rebukes Mamdani

City Journal: Breakdown of Not On Our Dime Act

Daily Beast: Mamdani’s rap tribute to Holy Land Five

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts